CLINICAL NORMS FOR AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE TESTING FOR FEMALES AT THE KORLEBU TEACHING HOSPITAL, ACCRA, GHANA

  • Kweku Hayford
  • Sesi Collins Akotey
  • Geoffrey K. Amedofu
  • Samuel Anim-Sampong
  • Yaw Nyadu Offei
Keywords: Auditory brainstem response, waves, intensity, normative, latency

Abstract

The aim of the study was to create an in-house normative data for neurodiagnostic auditory brainstem response test for the Korlebu Teaching Hospital Hearing Assessment Center, to enable the Centre to provide a comparative standard for making informed diagnostic decisions about patients’ auditory function using the Intelligent Hearing System (IHSSEP). A purposive sample of 25 females aged between 18-35 years with normal hearing thresholds were selected for the study. Data was analyzed using one sample independent t-test, mean, and standard deviation with the statistical significance set to p<0.05 to determine how the clinical norms compared with the manufacturer’s norm. Results showed that the absolute latencies generated by the study varied slightly from the IHSSEP norms. However, the variations emanated from the testing environment, the protocol used, and the software specifications of the testing equipment rather than pathological conditions from the participants. Besides, the norm data fulfilled the requirement of the upper and lower limits allowable for norm data to be considered as appropriate - thus a ±2 SD. It was concluded that the norms values were appropriate to use in testing and estimating hearing sensitivity at Korlebu Teaching Hospital Hearing Assessment Centre taking into account the clinical conditions and the varying parameters of the testing equipment.

Author Biographies

Kweku Hayford
  1. University of Education, Winneba, Ghana
Sesi Collins Akotey
  1. University of Education, Winneba, Ghana
Geoffrey K. Amedofu
  1. Korlebu Teaching Hospital, Korlebu, Accra
Samuel Anim-Sampong
  1. University of Ghana, School of Biomedical Sciences and Allied Health, Legon.
Yaw Nyadu Offei
  1. University of Ghana, School of Biomedical Sciences and Allied Health, Legon.

References

Arnold, S. A. (2000). The auditory brainstem response. In J. Roeser, M. Valente & H.Hosford
Dunn (Eds.) Auditory diagnosis . New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2000. p.
451-470.
Atcherson, S. R. (2012). The auditory brainstem response. In S. R. Atcherson and T.M.Stooday
(Eds). Auditory Electrophysiology: A Clinical Guide. New York: Thieme Medical
publishers Inc. 2012.
http://books.google.com.gh/books?id=8JsB5XQV3AcC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage
&q&f=false. Accessed June 18, 2015.
Baiduc, R. R., Poling, G. L., Hong, O., and Dhar, F. S. (2013). Clinical measures of auditory
function: The cochlear and beyond. Disease-a-Month 59. 147–156
Burkard, R. F., and Secor, C. (2000). Overview of auditory evoked potentials. In J. Katz (Ed.).
Handbook of Clinical Audiology (5th ed). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Coenraad, S., Van Immerzeel, T., Hoeve, L. J., and Goedegebure, A. (2010). Fitting model of
ABR age dependency in a clinical population of normal hearing children. Eur Arch
Otorhinolaryngol. 267:1531 –1537
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New
York: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data..
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey : Merrill Prentice Hall.
Don, M., and Kwong, B. (2009). Auditory brainstem response: differential diagnosis. In J. Katz,
L. Medwetsky, R. Burkard, L. Hood (Eds.). Handbook of Clinical Audiology (6th ed.).
Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Gathe, B. M., Gandhe, M. B., Gandhe, S. W., Puttewar, A. N., Saraf, C., and Singh, R. (2015)
Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) – A pilot study conducted on young healthy
adults from Central India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2014.8(6):BC16-
BC18.
http://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4515/8720_180414_R2_8720_CE%5BRa1%5D_PF1%
28AGAK%29_PFA%28AK%29.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan, 2015.
Gelfand, S. A. (2009) Essentials of audiology (3rd ed). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers
Inc.
Hall, J. W. (1992). Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Massachusetts: Library of congress
cataloguing-in-publishing data.
Hall, J. W. (2007). New handbook for auditory evoked response. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Hall, J. W., and Mueller, H. G. (1997). Audiologist desk reference. Vol.1: Diagnostic audiology
principles, procedures, and protocols. London: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Hood, L. J. (1998). Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response. London: Singular
Publishing group, Inc.
McMillan, J. H. (1997). Schumacher S. Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New
York: Longman.
Ness, D. A. (2009). Normative data for neurodiagnostic auditory brainstem response testing
(ABR). Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC.
http://books.google.com.gh/books?hl=en&lr=&id=UzxZwLgxXrgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&
dq=Ness,+D.+A.+%282009%29.+Normative+data+for+neurodiagnostic+auditory+brains
tem+response+testing++%28ABR%29. Accessed 24 Dec 2012
Offei, Y. N. (2013). Educational audiology in Ghana – developing screening tools for
hearing in infants and children. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Koln; 2013.
Silman, S., and Silverman, C. A. (1991). Auditory diagnosis; principles and applications.
Brooklyn: Academic Press Inc; 1991.
Sininger, Y. S., and Hyde, M. L. (2009). Auditory brainstem response in audiometric threshold
prediction. In Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkard R, Hood L. (Eds.).Handbook of Clinical
Audiology(6th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Sokolov, Y., Kurtz, I., Steinman, A., Long, G., and Sokolova, O. (2005). Integrity Technology:
Making ABR practical. Toronto: Vivosonic Inc. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from
http://www.audioelectronicsinc.com/images/Integrity_Technology_-_r_9_-
_05_08_29.pdf.
Vanderstoep, S. W., and Johnston, D. D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life: Blending
qualitative and quantitative approaches. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Published
2018-01-31