Vol 5 No 9 (2019): EPH - International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research (ISSN: 2208-2158)

Adoption of Conservation Farming Technologies as a Climate change Adaptation Strategy among Smallholder Farmers in Zambia: A case study of Chikankata District in the Southern Province of Zambia

Published October 8, 2019
How to Cite
Memory Hanyinde. (2019). Adoption of Conservation Farming Technologies as a Climate change Adaptation Strategy among Smallholder Farmers in Zambia: A case study of Chikankata District in the Southern Province of Zambia. EPH - International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research (ISSN: 2208-2158), 5(9), 01-80. Retrieved from https://ephjournal.com/index.php/aer/article/view/1553


This study was conducted to investigate what determines the adoption of conservation farming technologies as an adaptation strategy to climate change among small holder farmers in Chikankata district of Zambia. It specifically looked at the level of awareness of climate change and conservation farming technologies by small holder farmers, the prevalence of, and type of adoption of conservation farming   technologies, the nature of household characteristics and how they influence the adoption of conservation farming technologies, factors which influence the adoption of Conservation farming technologies and the nature of farming challenges continually faced by adopters and non-adopters of conservation farming technologies in the district.

The study used both qualitative and quantitative design. Primary data was collected using semi-structured questionnaires administered to smallholder farmers. An interview guide was used on agriculture/ camp officers and conservation farming field officers who are the key informants. A focus group discussion was also conducted with the lead farmers or farmer coordinators.  A total of 116 small holder farmers from the total population of 2301 were selected to participate in the study using simple random sampling method (table 2).  The data collected was coded using a coding scheme. It was later processed and analysed using the Statistical Package of the Social Sciences (SPSS). Secondary data was collected from published and unpublished(online) reports.

The study revealed that most of the smallholder farmers have heard and are aware of climate change and conservation farming respectively. The results indicate that sixty two per cent (62%) of the respondents are aware of climate change and eighty five per cent (85%) of the respondents are aware of conservation farming technologies. However, the level of adoption is still low despite the awareness and knowledge. Only thirty two per cent (32%) of the respondents have adopted Conservation farming technologies or Conservation Agriculture (CA) as it is sometimes called. The empirical evidence in this investigation does not support the assumption that most smallholder farmers in Chikankata district of Zambia have adopted conservation farming technologies but supports the notion that the adoption of conservation farming technologies by smallholder farmers is influenced by socio-economic and institutional factors. It can therefore be deduced from the findings that just sensitising the farmers and training them on conservation farming technologies is not adequate but the trainings should go hand in hand with the alleviation of the many challenges that are faced by the smallholder farmers.

The study therefore recommended that the government and other stakeholders, including NGOs should consider enhancing the adoption of conservation farming technologies by investing in appropriate agro equipment such as tractors, rippers and fiterelli planters (zero till Machinery) and also in farmer extension support considering that farmers need support in order for them to understand the concepts that come along with conservation farming technologies.

Additionally, the government should increase the smallholder farmers’ access to farming inputs through FISP and should also consider increasing the FISP pack. The government should revisit the FISP so that the most vulnerable people benefit from the programme and not only those with capital or who are already rich. There is also need to intensify sensitisations on conservation farming, trainings and field days.  Furthermore there is need for field officers to monitor agricultural activities so that they can give timely advice to farmers.


Download data is not yet available.


  1. Aagaard.P.J. (2007): Conservation Farming and Conservation Agriculture. Hand book for HOE farmers in Agro-Ecological Regions I &IIa. Flat culture.CFU.
  2. Aagaard.P.J. and the CFU team (2011): The practice of Conventional and Conservation Agriculture in East and Southern Africa. Zambia.
  3. Anne T. Kuriakose, Rasmus Heltberg, William Wiseman, Cecilia Costella, Rachel Cipryk and Sabine Cornelius (2012): Climate-Responsive Social Protection
  4. Background Paper for the World Bank 2012–2022 Social Protection and Labor Strategy Social Protection and labour. Discussion Paper No: 1210.
  5. Aregheore, E.M. (2006): Zambia II Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles. Ruminant Livestock Production Systems. Lusaka, Zambia microbes and most limiting nutrients, as well as low ways to deliver.
  6. Aslihan Arslan, N. M. (2013). Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. Retrieved July 2015
  7. Boyd HW, Westfall R, Stasch SF (1981). Marketing Research Text andCases, P. 813
  8. Burton. I. Dringer. E. Smith. J. (2006): Adaptation to Climate Change: International Policy options. PEW Centre on Global Climate Change. University of Toronto.
  9. Central Statistics Office (CSO) (2009): Demographic Projections- 2010-2015,CSO Printing Press, Lusaka.
  10. Central Statistics Office (CSO) (2010): Statistics based on the Living Conditions Survey 2010. CSO Printing Press, Lusaka.
  11. Cresswell .J.C (1994): Research Design: qualitative and Quantitative approaches. Second Edition. University of Nebraska. Lincoln. SAGE Publications. International Educational and Professional Publisher. Thousand Oaks London New Delhi
  12. Derpsch, R. (2001). Frontiers of Conservation Tillage and Advances in Conservation Practices. South America. 76pp.
  13. Derpsch, R. (2003):Conservation tillage, no till and related technologies. Conservation Agriculture Environmental Farmer Experience Innovation. Socio-Economic Policy, 181-190.
  14. Egenhofer and Georgier (2009): The Copenhagen Accord: A first stab at deciphering the Implications for the EU. Commentary, URL: www.Ogel.org/article asp? Key=3068(accessed on 12th December 2014).
  15. Ellen Wall, Barry Smit, and John Wandel (2007): Farming in a changing Climate: Agricultural Adaptation in Canada. UBC Press. Vancouver. Torontal
  16. GRZ (2009): National Adaptation Programme if Action (NAPA).
  17. Giller. K.E., Witter.E., Corbeels.M.andTittonell (2009):Conservation Agriculture and Smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field crops research. 23-34.
  18. Haggblade.S. andTembo. G. (2003): Conservation Farming in Zambia. EPTD Discussion Paper No. 108.
  19. Haggblade.S. et al (2011): Productivity Impact of Conservation Farming on Small holder cotton Farmers in Zambia. FSRP working Paper No. 47.
  20. IFAD (2011): Smallholder Conservation Agriculture: Rationale for IFAD involvement and relevance to the East and Southern African Region.
  21. Rome, Italy.
  22. www.ifad.org.
  23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the International Panelon Climate Change (Solomon, S et al.) .Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  24. Kanyanga, K. (2008): Precipitation and Temperature variations in Zambia: Evidence of climate change; A paper presented at Media Workshop on Climate Change and Global Warming held in Chipata, Zambia.
  25. Kassam (2014): Field Actions Science Reports: The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake.
  26. Vol. 7 Publisher: Institut Veolia
  27. http://factsreports.revues.org
  28. http://www.revues.org
  29. Kelly, T.C., Lu. Y. & Teasdale, J.1996. Economic-environmental tradeoffs among alternative crop rotations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 60(1): 27-28. Kern.
  30. Kombo.D.K and DelnoL.A. Tromp (2006): Proposal and Thesis Writing: an Introduction.Paulines Publications; Kenya.
  31. Long.N. and Long. A. (1992): Battlefields of Knowledge: The interlocking of theory and practice in Social Research and Development. London.Routledge.
  32. Maslin and Mark (2004): Global Warming: A very short Introduction. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
  33. Mason, M. N and T.S Jayne.(2012.)“Fertilizer Subsidies and Smallholder Commercial Fertilizer Purchases: Crowding out, Leakage, and Policy Implications for Zambia.” Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute Policy Brief No. 58. Lusaka, Zambia: IAPRI. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/zambia/ps_58.pdf
  34. Mwanza.H. and Mkomwa. S. (2013): Conservation Agriculture
  35. Study Tour Report For Eastern Africa Policy Makers And Practitioners To Zambia And Zimbabwe.
  36. Ministry Of Tourism, Environment And Natural Resources (MTENR 2007): The formulation of the National Adaptation Programme of Action on Climate Change. Final report.
  37. NAPA (2009): National Adaptation Programme of Action on Climate Change; Ministry of Tourism Environment and Natural Resources, Lusaka, Zambia.
  38. Ng’ombe.J. Thomson Kalinda, GelsonTembo& Elias Kantashula (2014): Econometric Analysisof the factors that Affect Adoption of Conservation Farming Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Zambia. Journal of Sustainable Development: Vol.7. No.4; 2014. Canadian Centre of Science and Education.
  39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n4p124
  40. Ngwira, Johnsen, Aune, Mekuria and Thierfelder (2014) Adoption and extentent of conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi: a journal of soil and water conservation . VOL 69. No.2
  41. Nyanga, P. H., Fred. H., Johnsen. F.H., Aune. F.; Kalinda.T.H. (2011): Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions of Climate Change and Conservation Agriculture: Evidence from Zambia. Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol 4, No 4, pp 73-84
  42. Orodho (2003): Essentials of educational and Social Sciences ResearchMethod. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.
  43. Parry.M., Rosenzweig.C., Iglesias. A., Livermore.M., Fisher. G. (2004): Effects of Climate Change on Global Food Production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change14: 53-67.
  44. Pretty.J. (1997): The Sustainable Intensification Of Agriculture: Making The Most Of The Land.International Institute for Environment and Development and Visiting Professor, University of Essex
  45. IIED, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H ODD, England.
  46. Rhoda Mofya-Mukuka, Stephen Kabwe, Auckland Kuteya and Nicole M. Mason(2012):
  47. How Can The Zambian Government Improve The Targeting Of The Farmer Input Support Program?Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute. Policy Brief No. 59. Lusaka, Zambia: IAPRI. http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/zambia/ps_59.pdf
  48. Saasa,O. (2003): Agriculture Intensification in Zambia: The role of Policies and Policy Process.MACRO study. Institute of Economic and Social Research. University of Zambia.
  49. Scherr, S. (1999).Soil degradation: A threat to developing-country food security by 2020? 2020 Discussion Paper 27. Washington, DC: InternationalFood Policy Research Institute.
  50. http://www.ifpri.org/2020/dp/dp27.pdf
  51. SharmaleneMendis, Suzanne Mills and JennipherYantz (2003): Building Community Capacity to adapt to Climate Change in Resource Based Communities. Prepared for the Prince Albert Model Forest.
  52. Singh.K.(2006): Fundamentals of Research Methodology and Statistics. New Age International Publishers. New Delhi.
  53. Stevens.P. (2009): Rain water harvesting: Soil and Water Conservation. Golden Valley Agricultural Research Trust. (GART). Lusaka.
  54. Vincent Katharine, Alec Joubert, Tracy Cull, John Magrath and Peter Johnston (2011): Overcoming The Barriers: How to Ensure Future Food Production Under Climate change In Southern Africa. Oxfam GB for Oxfam International Oxfam GB, Oxfam House, John Smith Drive, Cowley, Oxford, OX4 2JY, UK. ISBN 978-1-78077-012-3